Al-Qaeda and the US Patriot Act Essay - 1734 Words

Abstract This paper is on the terrorist group Al-Qaeda and the US Patriot Act. This paper will discuss the history, ideology, structure, targets and tactics of Al-Qaeda. I will discuss the history and goals of the US Patriot Act as well as the controversy that surrounds it. Finally I will discuss how the US Patriot Act serves as a deterrent to Al-Qaeda by enhancing domestic security against terrorism, enhancing surveillance procedures and removing obstacles to investigate terrorism. I hope that after you complete your review of my paper that you will have an appreciation for the creation of the US Patriot Act, because it protects Americans by making it difficult for terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda to operate in the United States.†¦show more content†¦The group was established around 1988. Al-Qaeda became a household name after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, quickly surpassing the IRA, Hamas, and Hezbollah. Al-Qaida is a multi-national network possessing a global r each. .Al-Qaeda produced the Encyclopedia of the Afghan Jihad in the 90s, which served as a detailed how-to guide for using handguns, explosives, and biological and chemical weapons. Al-Qaedas goal is to overthrow regimes it considers non-Islamic and expel Westerners and non-Muslims from Muslim countries. Al-Qaeda believes it’s the duty of Muslims to kill US citizens both civilian and military and our allies. After Al-Qaeda’s September 11, 2001, attacks on America, the United States launched a war in Afghanistan to destroy al-Qaeda’s bases there and overthrow the Taliban. I have firsthand experience fighting terrorism. I was stationed in Afghanistan in 2008. I served on the front lines of the war against terror in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. I travelled to remote parts of Afghanistan and Pakistan searching for terror suspects. I feel proud to know that I made a difference by taking down members of the Taliban. Additional Al-Qaeda’s goals and objectives are as follows: establishing the rule of God on earth, attaining martyrdom in the cause of God and the purification of the ranks of Islam from the elements of depravity. Some of the tactics Al-Qaeda employs are asShow MoreRelatedEssay about Homeland Security1415 Words   |  6 Pagesofficials responded in the only way that felt suitable, attacking terrorism. The group responsible for the events of 9/11 is called the Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda is one of the most well known terrorist groups in the world. Because of past issues with the Muslim community, the United States should have been prepared for a retaliation from them. This is a problem for us here in the United States because now the thought of another attack by one of the most powerful terrorist groups in the world is alwaysRead MoreTerrorism : A Global Issue Essay1749 Words   |  7 PagesEnglish 112 13 Sept 2015 Terrorism Many of us will embrace our loved ones before leaving our homes to start a hectic workday. As we hug our children and kiss our spouses goodbye, the thought of losing them, or our lives to acts of terrorism, is typically not one to cross our minds. On September 11, 2001, this mere thought became the reality for many families. The eleventh of September will forever be remembered as the date a terrorist organization, known as al-Qaeda, attacked the United States killing thousandsRead MoreI Know That More Deaths Occurred On 9 / 111067 Words   |  5 PagesHuffman 1 Dylan Huffman English II Dunnaway 2-2-16 Did you know that more deaths occurred on 9/11 than on Pearl Harbor? Most people don t know that these 19 terrorists killed more people in the US, than in the last couple decades. There are many questions asked about what happened on September 11th, but sadly, most of them remain unanswered. On Tuesday, September 11th, 2001 four airplanes we hijacked in the United States. This day will be remembered for a long time, it is known as 9/11. The fourRead MoreHow The War Of Terror Has Changed America1523 Words   |  7 PagesEngle Academic Writing 9 April 2015 How the War of Terror has Changed America On September 11, 2001 the United States of America was forever changed. A series of attacks lead by a man named Osama Bin Laden, the leader of the organization called Al-Qaeda, would bring America into a new war, the War on Terror. This war would not be like the wars of before, nation against nation, but would rather be a much more global conflict (â€Å"War†). The war would also not merely involve the United States, but alsoRead More9/11 Essay on law1587 Words   |  7 Pagesdetails of the terror attack. Many proposed theories have been brought forth, the most widely accepted being that of co-ordinated attacks by terrorist organisation â€Å"Al-Qaeda†. â€Å"9/11†, as the event is commonly known, is simply one of many global terrorism attacks that have seemingly consumed the contemporary world. Thus, it is up to the acts and responsibilities of governments and legal organisations to undertake action in attempt to achieve justice and equality throughout the wor ld, ensuring the safetyRead MoreAn International Terrorist Organization ( Al Qaeda1303 Words   |  6 PagesInvestigate an international terrorist organization (al-Qaeda) Al-Qaeda is an international terrorist organization that was founded in the late 1980’s by Osama bin Ladin and Abdullah Azzam. The organization is still currently active today, even though it has become largely decentralized with the deaths of many of its leaders following their attack on the twin towers in New York City, on September 11th, 2001. Al-Qaeda was founded towards the end of the Soviet Union’s attempted expansion into AfghanistanRead More The Patriot Act Essay1684 Words   |  7 PagesThe Patriot Act After the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001 our country underwent a change that has drastically affected the fundamental values that our founding fathers instilled in this country. Since that tragic day in September the aftermath of the attacks has started to implicate our Civil Liberties that in this country we hold so dear. Just 45 days after the September 11 attacks, with virtually no debate, Congress passed the USA Patriot Act on October 5th, 2001. This act expandedRead MoreThe Impact of September 11, 2001 Essay1221 Words   |  5 PagesOn September 11, 2001 a series catastrophic events occurred in New York City, New York. Al-Qaeda planned strategically conducted events, known as suicide attacks. Nineteen al-Qaeda members hijacked four commercial airplanes, including United Airlines Flight 93, American Airlines Flight 11, American Airlines Flight 77 and United Airlines 175. Two of the planes purposely crashed into the World Trade Center buildings. In addition, another p lane crashed into the Pentagon in Arlington, VA. and the fourthRead MoreTerrorism is a Chamaleon1289 Words   |  5 Pagesflourishes. Irredentism abounds†. (Lereche, p.117) On the morning of September 11, 2001, 19 terrorists attacked the United States. People around the world turned on their televisions and became spectators to one of the most devastating terrorist acts ever carried out on U.S. soil. The terrorists hijacked four airplanes in midair. Two of the planes flew into two skyscrapers at the World Trade Center in New York City. Another plane demolished part of the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia. The lastRead MoreThe Bombing Of Osama Bin Laden1269 Words   |  6 Pageswas al-Qaeda. The leader of al-Qaeda was Osama bin Laden. Osama bin Laden was born in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and then he would move to Afghanistan where he would start al-Qaeda. Al- Qaeda planned carefully in the attacks on the Unites States by sending nineteen militants over a period of several years to keep our suspicions down. They also held their meeting all across the globe. The planning meetings were held in Malaysia, they took flying lessons in the United States, and the leaders of al-Qaeda

The Effect Of Globalization On Communities - 1117 Words

The Effects of Globalization on Communities Cultures and societies evolve along with their growing abilities and changing environment, and each generation throughout history has had unique circumstances to learn from and deal with. The industrial revolution set the world on a much speedier path towards change which has been apparent in the last hundred years with growing cities and the rapid spread of technology. As the world establishes itself in the information age we find the connection between distant cultures becoming tighter and more intertwined. The effect of technology moving goods and information at increasing speeds is known as globalization. Globalization has already had profound effects throughout the continents and there†¦show more content†¦In this way, the irreversible trend of globalization can harm individuals as well as the social order of a region while escaping the grasp of those who could benefit the most. The globalization of local economies has real world effect on the lives of individuals and groups which should certainly be studied in order to reverse the known negative impacts. It would take both legislation and social work to allow those less fortunate to enjoy some benefits of our modern global society. An example of corporations benefitting from global import within larger industrialized nations can be seen across the United States with Wal-Mart’s long-growing takeover. For decades now, Wal-Mart has used its advantage of large-scale importing to stock its shelves with low priced home essentials. From the 80s to today, this successful company has crept over the American landscape, placing a location in every small town from the east to the west coasts. Wal-Mart offers a wide variety of merchandise under one roof, and has recently begun to incorporate a grocery into their buildings. Their merchandise purchases are large scale, normally overseas orders, the size of which allow a lower price that proves difficult competition for small businesses making smaller and more local purchases. The availability of inexpensive merchandise gathered during a single trip would seem to benefit a consumer on a budget, but this short term savings makes ripples

On Discourse Analysis, Looking at a Sample of Spoken Discourse from Michelle Obama’s Democratic National Conference Presentation free essay sample

On Discourse Analysis, looking at a sample of spoken discourse from Michelle Obama’s Democratic National Conference Presentation. In this paper I aim to apply different methods of discourse analysis to a selected extract of transcribed language. I have chosen to transcribe a speech given by the First Lady of the United States, Michelle Obama. Firstly, to briefly outline the context, the speech was given during the Democratic National Convention in September 2012, in the run up to the presidential election in which her husband, Barack Obama is rallying for re-election. Michelle is introduced by Elaine Brye, a ‘fellow mom’ and what’s more, ‘military mom’ of 5 sons, four of whom cover all of the American forces. Byre appropriately asks â€Å"What’s a mom like me doing in a place like this? I’m not even a political person! † She talks of her children as treasures, of how the Obama family have supported military families, and of how her and Michelle can relate ‘mom to mom’. This introduction sets the scene for what Michelle is about to talk about, giving rise to the topics of ‘ordinary-ness’, the stories of rags-to-riches, and the duty of ‘being mom-in-chief’, all of which appeals to the audience of American people. Michelle’s language has visible aims to make them feel united, empowered, proud, and hopeful. Michelle walks in wearing a cerise pink dress, waving and laughing and thanking the crowd for their applause, she is evidently humbled by the audience’s applause and cheer. There is also an apt choice of music by Stevie Wonder; with the lyrics â€Å"signed sealed delivered, I’m yours† this with a subtle, playful message perhaps hinting to their confidence in winning this election, given the physical acts of sealing and delivering a vote on election day, and of her husband ‘signing up’ for his new term in office. Michelle finally begins by thanking Elaine Brye, and uses the collective ‘we’, â€Å"We are so grateful for your family’s service and sacrifice, and we will always have your back† (YouTube clip 4:20)[1]. This ambiguous ‘we’ has the potential to be on behalf of either President Obama and herself, or indeed the American Public. Young and Fitzgerald (2006) state that â€Å"critical discourse analysts use several different methods to help them ‘dig’ beneath the surface of the discourse† (2006: 16). These include conversation analysis, and looking at politeness strategies, but for the purpose of my chosen sample, a public speech, one technique I have chosen to focus on, is Systemic Functional Linguistics, in an analysis ‘partnership’ with CDA. SFL is â€Å"a way of understanding the functions that language performs and the choices people make when they speak to exchange meaning with listeners† (2006: 16), and from my understanding of the process, it is necessary to ask a certain set of questions, when carrying out SFL research, which eventually lead us to answer â€Å"why a speaker or writer made these types of choices; and how they reflect relationships between powerful and weaker groups† (2006: 23). The first questions at this stage of SFL, is who is participating, and what are the processes and circumstances. Young and Fitzgerald comment: â€Å"When studying a discourse, SFL researchers are interested in the meanings that participants, processes and circumstances are creating. Using these labels helps analysts figure out ‘who is doing what to whom: when, where and how’ (2006: 16-17) There is the brief discourse between the first speaker Elaine, and Michelle, and between all speakers there is a sustained interaction with the audience, within the circumstance of a 23,000-seat North Carolina arena (MacAskill 2012). Therefore, for the most part, the purpose of Michelle’s language is to engage the American political supporters, although this audience is later extended to a world-wide audience due to the filming of the speech, it’s broadcast on ABC News, and subsequent access via the internet. She begins speaking, â€Å"with your help, with your help (4:00)† which immediately addresses the American audience, replying to their bellowing chants of â€Å"four more years†. This immediately creates a supportive atmosphere, a chant being something everyone in the audience can contribute to and participate in, Michelle is mirroring the three word phrase, as former Prime Minister Tony Blair once did, famously uttering the phrase Education, education, education! using reification to communicate a powerful message to the public. â€Å"Effective political communication has always relied on easily understood slogans and phrases† (Jones 1996: 27 cited in Charteris-Black 2011: 225), and in this context of a re-election campaign, MO effectively instills the fact that the desired outcome can only happen with the people’s help of going out to vote for her husband, Barack Obama. She continues to speak directly to Elaine, showing gratitude and making this beginning even more emotionally charged. In these foundations, a political underlay is felt, which may or may not have been intended. By having a ‘military mom’ introduce her, and by immediately talking about war and deployment, it could be inferred that she is encouraging and glorifying the concept, indeed going on to discuss the American Spirit, which she has â€Å"seen in our men and women in uniform in our proud military families (5:15)†. This inferred message is drawn from a Critical Discourse Analysis, whereby patterns which can be identified in a speech, using SFL, require further questioning, such as â€Å"What does this pattern mean? Does it have a purpose? And what does it show about his (her) intent? † (2006: 18). What is to be considered in the circumstance of this discourse, is it’s origin and originality, as any speech begs the question; â€Å"Do the words convey the speaker’s ‘real’ beliefs? † (Charteris-Black 2011: 5). Various newspaper articles, both in Britain and the USA, followed this speech with comment on the â€Å"personal thrust† (MacAskill 2012) MO displayed. Her role as First Lady is not an elected political role, and therefore her case here is as personal, as it is political. Throughout my analysis of this particular oral presentation, it has become apparent that a natural, well flowing narrative structure is present. It conceals, and is often broken with, rigid and fortified repetition, as in her use of the temporal adjective ‘everyday’ or an alliterative pattern of abstract nouns, as shown at (12:14) â€Å"dignity and decency†¦. honesty and integrity gratitude and humility†. Here she also repeats â€Å"we learned about†, initially addressing herself and Barack, MO â€Å"demonstrates what van Dijk describes as ‘positive self-representation’, in this case by attributing the above collection of desirable human qualities, which are emotionally appealing, to the audience† (cited in Charteris-Black 2011: 19). MO extends this to complement the audience by saying â€Å"those are the values that Barack and I and so many of you are trying to pass on to our own children† thus making the personal narrative inclusive and approving. Again, such a pattern has been observed using SFL, and it’s communications explored in CDA, whereby I believe this break from narrative structure puts a much increased emphasis on the keywords here which display features of alliteration and notably less spontaneity than the story they sit within. A study into the ‘Oral Versions of Personal Experience’ states that â€Å"Normally, narrative serves an additional function or personal interest determined by a stimulus in the social context in which the narrative occurs† (Labov and Waletzky 1966), which isn’t reflective of Michelle’s use of narrative in her speech. Due to the nature of the spoken discourse she doesn’t receive the external stimulus, she has the power to speak ‘at’ an unassuming audience, and her language is evidently more prepared and drafted, within the seemingly impromptu story-telling. Another spoken discourse feature which engages with the cohesion of the language is the list-of-three. Michelle uses this strategy almost seamlessly throughout, often employing the over-use of the conjunction ‘and’, such as â€Å"everywhere I’ve gone and the people I’ve met and the stories I’ve heard†¦Ã¢â‚¬  This elongates the utterance to emphasise her journey so far and the monotony in it’s assonance hint’s to the ‘never-ending’ experience as first lady of America. A CDA framework suggests her desire to remain in the White House, given her clues later in the speech which include semantic inferences of ‘unfinished business’, for example at (20:55), MO quotes her husband saying: â€Å"Michelle, We’ve got to keep working to fix this, we’ve got so much more to do! †, at which point she struggles to re-start through the repeated chants of ‘four more years’, giving her positive feedback and support her personal campaign. Michelle’s speech often chronicles the worries she had before her husband was elected President, four years prior to this speech. She keeps the parents and particularly the mothers in the audience involved, using a conversational style, â€Å"like any mother I was worried about what it would mean for our girls†, and retains the intimate style by asking rhetorical questions to the audience. â€Å"y’know, how would we keep them grounded?†. MO displays another example of the communicative power a list of three houses, when the â€Å"simple joys† of life before presidency arise: â€Å"Saturdays at soccer games, Sundays at Grandma’s house, and a date night for Barack and me†¦Ã¢â‚¬  whereby the two routine events precede the last which is more personal, and leads into a joke, â€Å"either dinner or a movie because as an exhausted mom I couldn’t stay awake for both! †. MO also uses a powerful list of three to introduce the topic of the ‘American Dream’, whilst simultaneously talking about her and Barack’s parents: â€Å"their unconditional love, their unflinching sacrifice and the chance to go places they had never imagined for themselves† (08:17). This is a clever lead into the topic, which is a known theme throughout Obama’s legacy. Such a visionary, and now almost controversial topic has been depicted as an unrealistic or unfulfilling struggle in renowned American literature such as ‘Of Mice and Men’ and ‘The Catcher in the Rye’. Charteris-Black states that President Obama is â€Å"The living embodiment of the policies he advocates as much as he provides their expressive medium† (2011: 280) which is interesting because Michelle also reflects this ‘dream life’ by employing the conceptual metaphor ‘The Nation is a Family’ which is broken down in Charteris-Black: â€Å"Ideas of the national family are persuasive because the family symbolises a source of security, and the desire to protect the family is at the basis of moral systems† (2011: 29). MO successfully unites the audience, as a family, in the context of the pre-election Democratic National Convention, so that her following speech relates even to those who perhaps don’t conform, struggle, work hard, or fight for their country in the military, and indeed those who are not living in an American Dream. This combination of language and pragmatics is working firstly to persuade supporters to vote, and secondly to support her husband in this credible narrative which their lives symbolise. â€Å"Barack knows what it means when a family struggles, he knows what it means to want something more for your kids and grandkids (17:40). Leading the audience back to the collective ‘we’, which is now strongly reinforced and familiar to the audience, she continues: â€Å"Barack knows the American dream because hes lived it, and he wants everyone in this country, everyone, to have that same opportunity, no matter who we are, or where were from, or what we look like, or who we love† (17:50). This resounding quote from the speech demonstrates the above observed SFL features, the elongated sentence which displays inclusiveness and again the ceaseless list of people who are accepted to, in a CDA inference, ‘vote Obama’. It also mentions ‘opportunity’ and is a very emotive and personal part of her speech, as she catches her breath and has tears in her eyes,. The act of persuasion is key in any political speech. Jowett and O’Donnell (1992) argue the three ways in which the persuader may seek to influence the receiver, including response shaping, response reinforcing and response changing. Michelle Obama is consistently reinforcing this American Dream discourse, moving from older stories about her and Barack’s grandparents, to future hope establishment for America’s children. The discourse always relates to ‘working a job’, fitting tight with Barack’s fair-pay and healthcare policies. Michelle announces a ‘fundamental American promise’ that â€Å"if you work hard and do what you’re supposed to do, you should be able to build a decent life for yourself, and an even better life for your kids and grand-kids (11:50)† and she speaks not as if people didn’t already believe or live by this, but as if it weren’t possible to believe this enough, and therefore reinforcement, and repetition reflect her attitude and stance in this section of the speech, an answer to the second question of SFL â€Å"What are the speaker’s or writer’s attitudes and stances? † (2006: 19). Jowett and O’Donnell continue to explain her persuasion technique: People are reluctant to change; thus, in order to convince them to do so, the persuader has to relate change to something in which the persuadee already believes. This is called an ‘anchor’ because it is already accepted by the persuadee and will be used to tie down new attitudes or behaviours† †¦ â€Å"A persuador analyses an audience in order to be able to express its needs, desires, personal and social beliefs, attitudes and values as well as its attitudes and concerns about the social outcome of the persuasive situation† (1992: 22-3 Cited in Charteris-Black 2011: 17-18). In this case the â€Å"anchor† as such, is Opportunity. And through the CDA framework, the ideology is now with working hard, taking your opportunities and creating the concept of a ‘better life’ for yourself and offspring. Ideology is explained by van Dijk as â€Å"the basis of the social representations shared by members of a group† (van Dijk 1998: 8 cited in Goatley 2007: 1) and Goatley neatly states â€Å"after all, we are all members of a community and share the thoughts and language that make action within that community or society possible† (2007: 1). MO has therefore created and reinforced an ideology which is appropriate and accessible to her audience, maintaining power and support in the discourse. This topic is notable because of the discussion of stance, in SFL, and the principles for CDA discussed in Young and Fitzgerald (2006: 24). Firstly using SFL to objectively note her position (stances) as a wife, mother, and First Lady, rather than that of a political figure, and her consequent stance when speaking at a Democratic National Convention. The CDA which stems from this enables an â€Å"explanation and interpretation of a discourse in terms of the relationships between language, power and ideology† (2006: 23). Ruth Wodak comments on the CDA principle that ‘discourse does ideological work’ in saying that â€Å"ideologies are particular ways of representing and constructing society, which reproduce unequal relations of power, relations of domination and exploitation’ and she notes that ‘they are often false and ungrounded’ (Wodak 1996: 17-20 cited in Young and Fitzgerald 2006: 24). Inherently, the conditional MO uses within the ‘American promise’ not only persuades ‘doing what you’re supposed to do†, it also inadvertently addresses issues of crime, alcohol and drug abuse, and other social problems which cost the government money and make it difficult for America to relieve their economic situation, things which challenge her husband’s job and reputation. In an emotive and personal way, Michelle is echoing Barack’s political ideologies and advocating whats is best for society. The combination of SFL and CDA however, â€Å"enables you to undertake a thoughtful and careful analysis that minimizes bias† (2006: 26), remembering that there are many more areas in a Presidents control which have altered the nations economic welfare. What is interestingly observed by Charteris-Black in his chapter which focuses solely on Barack Obama and the American Dream, is that this ‘dream’ can seem like a myth, in that it focuses so much on the future and the unknown but loosely possible, â€Å"The myth defies analysis and is even more irresistible when coming through someone who symbolises the dream† (2011: 309). Michelle’s reverberation of Obama’s initial 2008 policies, and her links to the present day, are all within this vocabulary chain of work and (financial) security, and the antecedent to â€Å"his agenda for the next term, which includes new jobs, new opportunity and new security for the middle class† (Curtis 2013), therefore leaving the audience member satisfied with consistency, optimism and hope, and the analyst very aware of the planning and intricacy in the core ideas that the Democratic speakers must exhibit in their language. At (26:20) she adds â€Å"surely, surely we can give everyone in this country a fair chance at that great American dream†. The third question highlighted in Young and Fitzgerald’s book is â€Å"what hold’s the discourse together? † (2006: 20). Cohesion and understandability in this speech is absolutely vital, because the secondary participant, the audience, is made up of such a vastly differing group of people, all of whom should relate to some extract from the speech. The camera angles cut to images of the young and old, certain public figures such as Lilly Ledbetter who influenced a bill for equal pay, and of course, to men and women of all classes and races in the crowd responding to MO. An observation in my analysis is the reference to feminism when Michelle tells the story of Barack’s grandmother. â€Å"she moved quickly up the ranks but like so many other women she hit a glass ceiling† (Clip 10:56) this not only reflects the inequalities of the time, but MO has retained the vocabulary chain of the war, struggle and military by choosing the metaphors â€Å"moving up ranks† and â€Å"hitting a glass ceiling†. In SFL question three these retentions are important in keeping the whole text’s Theme, â€Å"in SFL research, the term Theme, when capitalised has a more specific meaning; it refers to the initial words /phrases in a clause† (2006: 21). â€Å"In other words, why also encompasses questions of motivation, particularly with regard to how the speaker’s/writer’s choices constitute, maintain, and/or challenge relationships of power in our society† (2006:23). Not only this but here she subtly draws contrast with her husbands main opponent Mitt Romney, who’s policies on abortion and equal pay were deemed unclear, by â€Å"avoiding attacking him directly but making clear her belief that he was deeply our of touch with ordinary people† (MacAskill 2012). With regard to gender and language, â€Å"gender cannot be reduced simply to generalisations about all men or all women† (2006: 36). As mentioned previously, Michelle stands representing numerous female roles as a mother, wife and First Lady. Her language is highly emotive and this is typical of the female gender discourse, especially so when she discusses Barack’s grandmother’s circumstance in her job, talking of how â€Å"like so many women she hit a glass ceiling (10:56)†. The SFL analysis of this section not only highlights the use of the ‘glass ceiling’ metaphor, it notes the repetition of the agent/goal ‘men’, in comparison to the grandmother, men who â€Å"she had actually trained† who are being â€Å"no more qualified† yet â€Å"promoted up the ladder ahead of her†. This promotes a sense of ‘sisterhood’ and in CDA, given that it addresses social problems (Wodak cited in Young and Fitzgerald 2006: 14) would suggest that Michelle is emphasising the difference in today’s society, how times have changed even though what happened to Barack’s grandmother seemed acceptable at the time (â€Å"giving her best without complaint or regret† (11:19)) and cleverly makes link to her husbands campaign, â€Å"So when it comes to rebuilding our economy, Barack is thinking about folks like my dad and like his grandmother, he’s thinking about the pride that comes from a hard days work, thats why he signed the Lilly Ledbetter fair pay act, to help women get equal pay for equal work† (14:46) MO returns to these points of equality and fairness at (22:15) â€Å"for Barack there is no such thing as Us and Them†, having previously claimed at (16:25) â€Å"he believes that women are more than capable of making our own choices about our bodies and our healthcare, thats what my husband stands for†. For the audience, this is now more credible coming from a woman, and needless to say, a women who is thought to know the president and his thoughts better and truer than anyone else. Lastly in this section, at (24:05) â€Å"let us never forget that doing the impossible is the history of this nation it is who we are as Americans and it is how this country was built (24:05)†. One of her final statements in the speech, and one which was most poignant in headlines and reports following its execution, is at (27:00) â€Å"At the end of the day, my most important title is still mom in chief†. To conclude, Michelle is making a personal and political case for her husbands re-election. She is supporting, echoing and repeating some of his key ideas and policies, as well as engaging with an audience with whom she relates to in typical ways such as being a mom, a worker, and simply, an American. She stands as ‘living proof’ of the American Dream, (as does her husband), and says all the ‘right’ things about raising a family and wanting to better yourself through struggle and triumph. Thus making her speech inspirational and ‘feel-good’. Through the combination of Systemic Functional Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis, guided by a book entitled ‘The Power of Language’ by Young and Fitzgerald (2006), the concern with the interconnections among power, ideology and language has been explored in this particular extract to reveal the ways in which a speech of this personal and political hybrid nature, can influence thought and action within the audience. Mostly. Michelle Obama has done this by taking narrative-style, personal experience, and carefully structured language including simple phrases which will reverberate in the listeners mind, such as â€Å"with your help† and â€Å"forward†. These phrases became key elements in the branded ‘Obama’ campaign, seen all over the world. And at this time of writing, it is known he was re-elected and has just begun his second term as the President. The end of the speech is worth extracting, as it demonstrates the seamless cohesion of topics and captures the intrinsic message of the whole speech: â€Å"Today, I know from experience, if I truly want to leave a better world for my daughters, for all of our sons and daughters, if we wanna give all of our children a foundation for their dreams, and opportunities worthy of their promise, it, if we wanna give them that sense of limitless possibility, their belief that here in America there is always something better out there if you’re willing to work for it, then we must work like never before! And we must once again come together and stand together for the man we can trust to keep moving this great country forward, my husband, our president, Barack Obama! † (27:35) As she introduces her husband, there is further overwhelming support from the audience, who appear genuinely moved by the experience. van Dijk states that â€Å"CDA is designed to provide a more in-depth insight into the implications of the language we use; particularly the societal consequences† (1993).

Persuasive Essay for Martial Arts free essay sample

Able to Keep Yourself Safe Every year, millions of people are kidnapped, raped and/or killed. As a result, many people have decieded to enroll themselves and their children into some type of self-defense class, so they can better protect themselves. The ability to protect yourself when being attacked is vital, therefore, in order to better understand how to keep yourself safe, you must consider whether you have the stamina, self-control and knowledge. You can be attacked anywhere at anytime, physically one of the first things you should possess is stamina. For example body strength would be very helpful when it comes to enduring being attacked. If you have more strength it will be easier defend yourself by blocking strikes and attacking back. When attacking back, you want each hit to be very effective. In addition, your state of mind could save your life, if the mind is in the right place a person can achieve anything, like getting away with your life. We will write a custom essay sample on Persuasive Essay for Martial Arts or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page After getting hurt by the opposition, your mind may be telling you â€Å"it’s over† but you have to make it believe other wise. Keep your mind optimistic, tell yourself you can do it because the second you are pessimistic you have defeated yourself. Stamina will help endure through the difficult situation. A major part of protecting yourself is perseverance, while the confrontation and preparing for it. Of course to be good at anything, especially defending yourself, you must practice. There are some days practicing seems tiring and insignificant, but you never know when you will use what you practice so it is important that you continuously train. When you actually use the self-defense that you have practiced, it is an overwhelming feeling of accomplishment. Consequently, it all comes down to a person’s self-control. A situation may arise that seems hard to escape, but if a person has good self-control they will know exactly what to do. A person can do anything that they put his or her mind to. When practicing, a person should motivate themselves, by telling themselves to do something and accomplishing it. In the end, there is still something missing, knowledge gained through experience by practicing, without it both stamina and perseverance is ineffective. Not only is flailing your hands about in an attempt to punch useless, but also strenuous. With experience anyone can learn how and the most best places to strike. It is important that people have experience because more than 80% of people have a tendency to freeze up when being attacked. Of course, if you know how to retaliate whether by blocking, punching, or kicking will reduce the amount trauma to your body. With less trauma to your body, it will be easier to fight back. When you have gotten your opponent to a position you feel comfortable, it will be easy to escape. During the confrontation, knowledge is an necessity. After taking self-defense classes, many people are effected. Attending the classes is worth it because not only do I get exercise but also learn many things. I enjoy attending self-defense classes and feel as though many people could benefit from the experience. Self- defense classes help many people to become more disciplined. While practicing I have noticed a greater increase of confidence of not only me but also people around me. In reality, if there was a real confrontation I believe the classes have prepared me for it.